Saturday, September 10, 2011
2011 Week 1 Predictions
Week 1 Prediction
NO (0-0-0) @ GB (0-0-0) Pred: GB
ATL (0-0-0) @ CHI (0-0-0) Pred: CHI
IND (0-0-0) @ HOU (0-0-0) Pred: HOU
BUF (0-0-0) @ KC (0-0-0) Pred: KC
CIN (0-0-0) @ CLE (0-0-0) Pred: CLE
PIT (0-0-0) @ BAL (0-0-0) Pred: BAL
PHI (0-0-0) @ STL (0-0-0) Pred: STL
DET (0-0-0) @ TB (0-0-0) Pred: TB
TEN (0-0-0) @ JAC (0-0-0) Pred: JAC
MIN (0-0-0) @ SD (0-0-0) Pred: SD
CAR (0-0-0) @ ARI (0-0-0) Pred: ARI
NYG (0-0-0) @ WAS (0-0-0) Pred: WAS
SEA (0-0-0) @ SF (0-0-0) Pred: SF
DAL (0-0-0) @ NYJ (0-0-0) Pred: NYJ
NE (0-0-0) @ MIA (0-0-0) Pred: MIA
OAK (0-0-0) @ DEN (0-0-0) Pred: DEN
Predicted final standings if the ITB is 100% accurate:
AFC-E NYJ 15 1
BUF 10 6
NE 1 15
MIA 6 10
AFC-N PIT 12 4
BAL 10 6
CLE 3 13
CIN 3 13
AFC-S HOU 9 7
JAC 5 11
TEN 2 14
IND 0 16
AFC-W DEN 16 0
KC 10 6
SD 9 7
OAK 3 13
NFC-E WAS 12 4
DAL 8 8
NYG 4 12
PHI 3 13
NFC-N CHI 14 2
MIN 5 11
DET 2 14
GB 0 16
NFC-S NO 15 1
ATL 12 4
TB 11 5
CAR 6 10
NFC-W SF 16 0
STL 14 2
SEA 9 7
ARI 8 8
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Love the postulate! Also, NO played @ GB, so the prediction of NO to win makes it seem as if the postulate erred. But it didn't. I won't point out who did err, because it would seem ungracious to you, my lovely host.
ReplyDeleteOops! That was purely a data-entry error. Thanks for catching that. It will be fixed in Tuesday's weekend wrap-up.
ReplyDeleteIn fact, I've correct it now...
ReplyDelete